After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are reviving these kinds of systems. By lie recognition tools analyzed at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being found in asylum applications. This article explores how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to browse through these devices and to pursue their right for safety.
It also demonstrates how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering all of them from accessing the programs of safety. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight into the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/portals-of-the-board-of-directors-for-advising-migrant-workers mechanisms of them technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects just who are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: although they assist with expedite the asylum process, they also produce it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.